Knights Revenge

Discussion of official LEGO Castle Theme sets and products
Post Reply
thedevil44
Serf
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:50 am

Knights Revenge

Post by thedevil44 »

I'm a long time lurker, first time poster. I was looking on Wikipedia a couple of days ago, (I know first mistake) when I noticed that for the 2009 Castle line it says there is supposed to be a set called Knight's Revenge. I realize the set number that is listed is 7091 which is the set number for Knights Catapult Defense. This further made me feel that this is not a real set, but rather one of Wikipedias downfalls. Does anyone have information either way on this.

link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Castle
User avatar
Username
Councilor
Posts: 1049
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Texas! YEHAW!

Re: Knights Revenge

Post by Username »

I'm saying it's bunk based on the set title alone.
User avatar
Heir of Black Falcon
Justiciar
Posts: 1966
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: Utah (I'm baaaack)

Re: Knights Revenge

Post by Heir of Black Falcon »

Hmmmm.... interesting. The name and source do sound dubious.

I guess we have to wait and see.

Heir
There ain't nothin' girlie about a tunic...
User avatar
Athos
Councilor of the Realm
Posts: 4262
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:33 am
Location: Nevada
Contact:

Re: Knights Revenge

Post by Athos »

I wonder if it might be a bad bit of translating from a non-English list? We've had similarly poor translations before (the Perfidies of Akator comes to mind).

The number issue strikes me as fake though...

Steve
[url=http://www.johnny-thunder.blogspot.com/]Travel with Johnny Thunder![/url]
User avatar
outcast
Apprentice
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:44 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Knights Revenge

Post by outcast »

Anyone can go on wikipedia and change the text by using the edit button. I expect it is just a joke. This is why I never believe things on wikipedia unless it has proof.
For Empire is no more, and now the Lion & Wolf shall cease.
User avatar
Heir of Black Falcon
Justiciar
Posts: 1966
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: Utah (I'm baaaack)

Re: Knights Revenge

Post by Heir of Black Falcon »

It is odd though. You'd think someone familiar enough with current castle would know the set numbers better than that. Much easier to simply add a few numbers in a series and make it look a bit more likely. Still seems off but I am not sure it was intentional deception, at least the number that is.

Heir
There ain't nothin' girlie about a tunic...
User avatar
albero78
Bailiff
Posts: 311
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:49 am
Location: Bruxelles, Belgium (but I am Italian)

Re: Knights Revenge

Post by albero78 »

Interesting but it says just 36 pieces... :sly:
Andrea Albertazzi
[url=http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=albero78]MY BRICKSHELF GALLERY[/url] | [img]http://img360.imageshack.us/img360/9002/itarp2.jpg[/img]
User avatar
outcast
Apprentice
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:44 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Knights Revenge

Post by outcast »

It's not there anymore.

Interesting...
For Empire is no more, and now the Lion & Wolf shall cease.
thedevil44
Serf
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:50 am

Re: Knights Revenge

Post by thedevil44 »

This wikipedia entry has been erased, most likely by a person that is part of this community. That is very helpful, because I hate being misled. There was also another set about a week age with a box number of 1019?. This has also been erased thanks to a keen eye that I would imagine is also from this site as well. I would just like to extend a thank you to whoever has done this, because Wikipedia is a real pain and as I said I hate being misled and getting my hopes up for something that isn't real. :?
User avatar
Heir of Black Falcon
Justiciar
Posts: 1966
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: Utah (I'm baaaack)

Re: Knights Revenge

Post by Heir of Black Falcon »

While I think it is likely not a real set I am not sure it reasons that it is not real because it was erased. Anyone can add or erase what they please on Wiki. Just because I erased something on Wiki because I do not think it to be a real set/etc. does not mean that it will not be.

Heir
There ain't nothin' girlie about a tunic...
Post Reply