In retrospect I can't honestly say that the Royal Knight's were as great as past sets, but I certainly don't think they were terrible as many people seem to. Change the logo of the faction, and I would be willing to bet many people wouldn't seem to think they are so bad.
I for one will always be pleased with the line as it brought me the biggest castle I had ever owned in the Royal Knight's Castle, something I begged for for my birthday. Looking at the castle today through an adult rather than a child's eyes does expose some flaws.
However, since I did not grow up with the King's Castle, a favorite here apparently, I see flaws in that as well. Realistically, the King's Castle IS the better castle. However, having owned both, I will always prefer the Royal Knight's only because I remember playing with it as a child.
Today, I think I would prefer a castle with the size and interior of the RK castle with the color and realism of the King's Castle. If Lego were to release a massive castle (RK's) with tons of soldiers (RK's and K'sC), high walls completely surrounding the castle (K'sC), tall and rounded towers (RK's), and release it in the old grey (K'sC), I would be in heaven.
I guess my point is the fact that I would like a castle that is a mixture between the RK's castle and the King's Castle, but if I had to choose strictly between the two that were released, I would always choose the RK's castle. Although it isn't as realistic or solidly built, I simply have a history with it that cannot be recaptured by any other set. That is why I sold my King's Castle. It wasn't bad by any stretch of the immagination, but I have found that I prefer to buy sets now that I either owned or wanted to own in my childhood than sets that came out either before or after (with a few rare exceptions, such as the Guarded Inn).
Nostalgia has warped my objectivity I suppose, and being only 20 and one of the younger members of this board (or so I believe) I will likely always be in the minority when sets of "my" era are reviewed.


