CCC XXI
Re: CCC XXI
It was in the spam folder... answer will follow tomorrow
- CaptainFlint
- Villein
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:07 pm
- Location: Slovenia
Re: CCC XXI
Nice categories this year. I have a question. I already posted the creation in the Religious Building category and I wasn't happy with how I made the terrain and I changed it after posting. Is this even allowed? If it is not, then remove my participation. I'm really sorry for the mess, but I had to change it because I really want to have a good creation for myself.
- Bluesecrets
- High Priestess of the Vermillion Order
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:21 pm
- Location: On the girls side of the castle.
- Contact:
Re: CCC XXI
The admin team is discussing and will get back to you with an answer.CaptainFlint wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 5:57 pm Nice categories this year. I have a question. I already posted the creation in the Religious Building category and I wasn't happy with how I made the terrain and I changed it after posting. Is this even allowed? If it is not, then remove my participation. I'm really sorry for the mess, but I had to change it because I really want to have a good creation for myself.
Re: CCC XXI
Hello again! I have another question regarding the “before 1996” category: Are modern versions of the same shield designed allowed?
I’m specifically asking about the shields included with set 10305, Lion Knight’s Castle (2022). Several of the designs are reprints of classic designs, but they have separate BrickLink catalog entries.
Technically, I think they may be allowed under the grey/light bluish grey substitution rule, but I figured it wouldn’t hurt to ask for clarification due to the printed designs.
Obviously, if allowed, I would only use the designs that have a matching design in the classic sets, and I would include proof of that with my submission, if necessary.
Thanks in advance!
I’m specifically asking about the shields included with set 10305, Lion Knight’s Castle (2022). Several of the designs are reprints of classic designs, but they have separate BrickLink catalog entries.
Technically, I think they may be allowed under the grey/light bluish grey substitution rule, but I figured it wouldn’t hurt to ask for clarification due to the printed designs.
Obviously, if allowed, I would only use the designs that have a matching design in the classic sets, and I would include proof of that with my submission, if necessary.
Thanks in advance!
- Elephant Knight
- CC Spriggan
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:34 am
- Location: Hiding.
- Contact:
Re: CCC XXI
All of the shields that are basically just new versions of old ones are fine. The one with the dual background colours, aka, the queens shield, is a new design, so we will allow all but that one.Roxanne wrote: ↑Mon Nov 27, 2023 6:24 pm Hello again! I have another question regarding the “before 1996” category: Are modern versions of the same shield designed allowed?
I’m specifically asking about the shields included with set 10305, Lion Knight’s Castle (2022). Several of the designs are reprints of classic designs, but they have separate BrickLink catalog entries.
Technically, I think they may be allowed under the grey/light bluish grey substitution rule, but I figured it wouldn’t hurt to ask for clarification due to the printed designs.
Obviously, if allowed, I would only use the designs that have a matching design in the classic sets, and I would include proof of that with my submission, if necessary.
Thanks in advance!
EKnight
- the Inventor
- Laborer
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:34 am
- Location: The Whispering Woods
- Contact:
Re: CCC XXI
Question regarding the village category, if the buildings are attached, does it count as one or multiple?
For example next to each other in a street, or attached to a single central building (e.g. a gatehouse)?
What if in a fantasy village some buildings are build on top of each other (each would still have it's own entrance)?
For example next to each other in a street, or attached to a single central building (e.g. a gatehouse)?
What if in a fantasy village some buildings are build on top of each other (each would still have it's own entrance)?
- Bluesecrets
- High Priestess of the Vermillion Order
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:21 pm
- Location: On the girls side of the castle.
- Contact:
Re: CCC XXI
I need to discuss this with the team before I can answer.the Inventor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2023 4:42 pm Question regarding the village category, if the buildings are attached, does it count as one or multiple?
For example next to each other in a street, or attached to a single central building (e.g. a gatehouse)?
What if in a fantasy village some buildings are build on top of each other (each would still have it's own entrance)?
- Bluesecrets
- High Priestess of the Vermillion Order
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:21 pm
- Location: On the girls side of the castle.
- Contact:
Re: CCC XXI
Sorry I didn't get back to you. The answer is yes but with a limited time frame. Meaning, it needs to be edited before the last week of the contest. When I'm approving a lot of last minute entries.CaptainFlint wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 5:57 pm Nice categories this year. I have a question. I already posted the creation in the Religious Building category and I wasn't happy with how I made the terrain and I changed it after posting. Is this even allowed? If it is not, then remove my participation. I'm really sorry for the mess, but I had to change it because I really want to have a good creation for myself.
Re: CCC XXI
Thank you very much!Elephant Knight wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:23 am
All of the shields that are basically just new versions of old ones are fine. The one with the dual background colours, aka, the queens shield, is a new design, so we will allow all but that one.
EKnight
Re: CCC XXI
Another question. I really can't find, for example, if the tan 32x32 baseplate did exist before 1995.
Baseplates itself were born in 1978, so that's no problem. As far as I can find, the tan color did exist before 1995.
But can I use a tan baseplate?
This is just an example. Some parts and colors did exist before 1995, but the part-color-combination did not. Do I have to check this?
Another question: arch 1 x 6 is replaced bij arch 1x6 raised arch. I think it's not a problem to use the new one. Is that true?
And the same question for other arches, like 1 x 12 x 3.
Baseplates itself were born in 1978, so that's no problem. As far as I can find, the tan color did exist before 1995.
But can I use a tan baseplate?
This is just an example. Some parts and colors did exist before 1995, but the part-color-combination did not. Do I have to check this?
Another question: arch 1 x 6 is replaced bij arch 1x6 raised arch. I think it's not a problem to use the new one. Is that true?
And the same question for other arches, like 1 x 12 x 3.
- AK_Brickster
- Admin
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:02 pm
- Location: Mushing through the Great Driftplains of Garheim
- Contact:
Re: CCC XXI
According to Bricklink, the 32x32 baseplate in Tan was first released in 1997, in set #6559 "Deep Sea Bounty".
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn ... 2&srtAsc=A
You can look this kind of info up by searching for the part on Bricklink, selecting tan in the "Known Colors" secton on the right, and then sorting by year released.
Variations that have relatively minor aesthetic differences should be fine, as long as any functional features added by the new variant are not taken advantage of in your build. Your example of 1x6 arch vs 1x6 raised arch is totally acceptable, but for example, if the original part had no clutch/poor clutch on the underside, but the new one has excellent clutch, don't take advantage of that change in your build.
Great questions, keep 'em coming!
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn ... 2&srtAsc=A
You can look this kind of info up by searching for the part on Bricklink, selecting tan in the "Known Colors" secton on the right, and then sorting by year released.
Variations that have relatively minor aesthetic differences should be fine, as long as any functional features added by the new variant are not taken advantage of in your build. Your example of 1x6 arch vs 1x6 raised arch is totally acceptable, but for example, if the original part had no clutch/poor clutch on the underside, but the new one has excellent clutch, don't take advantage of that change in your build.
Great questions, keep 'em coming!
Re: CCC XXI
Thanks a lot. I'm happy I'm not using the tan baseplate, but an older color
Re: CCC XXI
New question: the rules allow to use the new grey parts. But in 1995 there were almost no dark gray parts... As far as I can find it was introduced around 1998 as a color for plates and slopes...
What about this? Is dbg allowed to use or not?
What about this? Is dbg allowed to use or not?
- soccerkid6
- Admin
- Posts: 2169
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:41 pm
- Location: Nordheim Keep
- Contact:
Re: CCC XXI
Yes that is fine. The new light and dark bluish gray, along with reddish brown are fine to substitute for their old counterparts
John 14:6, Jesus answered, "I am the way the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."
Brickbuilt: http://www.brickbuilt.org/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/isaacsnyder/
Brickbuilt: http://www.brickbuilt.org/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/isaacsnyder/