Dragon Master:
I want to protest a release of the Yellow Castle if there are plans, or try to stop plans from happening.
I'd disagree. My responses below:
Dragon Master:1. Yellow- Yellow was ok back when grey and black weren't around. If yellow castle came back it wouldn't fit anywhere! Not even with the new KK knights. Most of us have lots of gray and yellow would have no place amound the stone castles.
While I would prefer a better color such as light or dark gray or tan (here someone did it in tan:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=249707 ), they didn't do it in yellow because gray did not exist at the time. 375 came out in the same year as the first Classic Space sets (1978), so gray existed. Yellow was a choice that they made. I'm not saying it was the best choice, but they did have reason other than no other color possibilities.
Dragon Master:2. Armor- The armor that the knights had was great for the time. But putting Yellow Castle out again would be a digression. The plate mail and even the breastplate are more accurate then the sheets that the people wore.
I agree, but I think that misses the point of a Legend. A Legend isn't just a parts pack, it's an awesome set by itself.
Dragon Master:3. Horses- Block horses have no place in a world where the one-piece horses exist. Having a cavalry of 50 horses and 4 block horses would look terrible. Again it would be a digression.
I'd say they should release it with block horses as that would be true to the Legend. One-piece horses are so plentiful that anyone concerned could easily replace them.
Dragon Master:4. Fraud- There could be many problems at auctions, shows, and bricklink. People trying to pass of the new Legend as the old. I see many problems considering the Classic sets are quite pricey to say the least.
Okay, but you could do this anyway. I'm sure with some Bricklinking and my parts collection I could put together 375 (granted, this is an argument on your side that you didn't use for the lack of need of a 375 Legend) and put it up on e-bay saying that I had lost the box. But the secondary market isn't really TLC's concern. If it were they would commonly put out limited edition sets that would be immediate collectors' items and they would never do rereleases. Their job is to maximize their own profits, not those of e-bay merchants.
Dragon Master:5. Ok, this is my biggest argument. Yellow Castle is the biggest treasure in the castle world, and understandibly so. For those who had and still have it they cherish it. Eveyone wants one, I do. But a LEGEND is not the way to accuire one. Having thoushands more out there would cut the sentimental feelings about it. If there was a surplus it would not seems so special. And when the younger folk buy them they would have no idea of its value to the castle world, it would just be another set on the shelf. I'll give an example, take a classic car like the Ford Model T. What if they were to reproduce them nearly a century after the fist ones. That would make the old ones loose the "special" thing about them.
I disagree. This is an argument based in elitism, IMHO. Kind of an "I got my 375 and I paid out a ton of cash, I don't want anyone else to have the fun." The point of the Legends line is exactly to put out some of the great sets that people wanted but couldn't get. Your argument is why they should not have a Legends line at all (which means no rereleased Guarded Inn, no BFF, etc.). Given that they have already decided to have a Legends line, this argument is moot. 375 is the definition of a Legend, IMO. It's a great design, awesome playability, and it started out the greatest theme in Lego history (IMO, of course). Plus it was out in 1978, with means there are AFOLs (not KFOLS) who were not even born when this was no longer available.
I would, however, agree that a compromise solution would be best, a Legend set that recreated the design of 375 in different colors--kind of the same way they rereleased a redesigned version of the X-Wing and soon he Millenium Falcon as ways to rerelease sets but give added value.
Bruce