Open message to The LEGO Company. We make no guarantee that anyone from LEGO will actually read them, let alone respond!
DARKspawn
Lord
Posts: 1631 Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:29 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Post
by DARKspawn » Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:08 am
Athos wrote: I can't believe how many people voted yes...
Steve
probably for fear of having no castle them at all ... I know I was tempted
Sir Kohran
Sheriff
Posts: 1568 Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:24 am
Post
by Sir Kohran » Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:53 am
DARKspawn wrote: Athos wrote: I can't believe how many people voted yes...
Steve
probably for fear of having no castle them at all ... I know I was tempted
Or maybe because it was just a decent line that some people liked?
- Matt
Maedhros
Knight Templar
Posts: 1885 Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: The dark forests of Sweden
Contact:
Post
by Maedhros » Sun Jan 07, 2007 10:09 am
Sir Kohran wrote: DARKspawn wrote: Athos wrote: I can't believe how many people voted yes...
Steve
probably for fear of having no castle them at all ... I know I was tempted
Or maybe because it was just a decent line that some people liked?
- Matt
Or maybe we shouldn´t start debating this..... AGAIN
"Hinc satis elucet maiorem habere uim ad discenda ista liberam curiositatem quam meticulosam necessitatem.”
- Augustinus Hipponensis
Assamite
Serf
Posts: 24 Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:09 am
Post
by Assamite » Sun Jan 07, 2007 10:17 am
I don't see why the jelly bean knights can't show up for cameos in the new line, maybe with a slightly improved look. Lions & Falcons were showing up years after their core runs ended.
CM
Spongey
Merchant
Posts: 1377 Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:39 pm
Location: Canada
Post
by Spongey » Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:13 pm
Hoping that this doesn't spark a holy war, like the one present when we reviewed Vladek's Dark Fortress, I would have to vote no. I would be willing to go without castle for a couple of years if it gave LEGO time to come up with something good. Anyways, there is a new castle line coming along in 2007, so I have no reservations when condemning KKII.
Sir Kohran
Sheriff
Posts: 1568 Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:24 am
Post
by Sir Kohran » Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:23 pm
Maedhros wrote: Sir Kohran wrote: DARKspawn wrote:
probably for fear of having no castle them at all ... I know I was tempted
Or maybe because it was just a decent line that some people liked?
- Matt
Or maybe we shouldn´t start debating this..... AGAIN
Well, seeing as KK2 has had its time, and is now taking a break, I guess it is a pointless argument.
- Matt
Maedhros
Knight Templar
Posts: 1885 Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: The dark forests of Sweden
Contact:
Post
by Maedhros » Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:15 pm
Sir Kohran wrote: Well, seeing as KK2 has had its time, and is now taking a break, I guess it is a pointless argument.
Taking a break..? I´d be very surprised if it ever showed up again, I mean that has never happened to any other faction..
"Hinc satis elucet maiorem habere uim ad discenda ista liberam curiositatem quam meticulosam necessitatem.”
- Augustinus Hipponensis
JPinoy
Knight Bannerett
Posts: 2476 Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Rockefeller Center LEGO Store
Contact:
Post
by JPinoy » Wed Jan 10, 2007 12:27 am
Is it possible to have KK2, Castle 2007, and Vikings run simultaneously???
Thats like having 3 Castle Themes run at the same time... Basically, Castle PWNZ the other themes in continuity, variety, and etc.
architect
Baron von Ellermann
Posts: 3708 Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 5:10 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO USA
Contact:
Post
by architect » Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:16 am
This thread is now irrelevant. I am locking it. Have a nice day
Ben
CC Sets Admin